From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 09:10:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0D316A46C for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wundram@beenic.net) Received: from mail.beenic.net (mail.beenic.net [83.246.72.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8826813C4DB for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wundram@beenic.net) Received: from [192.168.1.38] (a89-182-91-221.net-htp.de [89.182.91.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.beenic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70119A44529; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:10:33 +0100 (CET) From: "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" Organization: Beenic Networks GmbH To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:10:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47B1F8B7.7030803@delphij.net> <20080216235001.GA80694@sub.vaned.net> <20080218085323.GA1439@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <20080218085323.GA1439@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802181010.44055.wundram@beenic.net> Cc: "Christian S.J. Peron" Subject: Re: valgrind or workalike on FreeBSD/amd64 7.0/8.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:10:35 -0000 Am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 09:53:23 schrieb Ulrich Spoerlein: > When will mere mortals like us get a chance to play with it? I found > valgrind _very_ useful back in the 5.x and 6.x days. I just wanted to say that I'd also be very interested in testing it out (if you need testers for it), because currently I always (have to try to) compile applications I want to memcheck (which is my main reason for using valgrind) on Linux, which is a slight PITA. I'd be running it on i386, anyway. Thanks for any feedback in advance, and thanks for the effort! -- Heiko Wundram Product & Application Development