From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 29 20:13:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FCE16A402 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from wjv.com (fl-65-40-24-38.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B77413C47E for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:13:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost.wjv.com [127.0.0.1]) by wjv.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l0TKDm1f072815; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:13:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l0TKDgh0072814; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:13:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bv) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:13:42 -0500 From: Bill Vermillion To: Michael Proto Message-ID: <20070129201342.GA72762@wjv.com> References: <20070129192254.GB72262@wjv.com> <45BE5214.7080907@jellydonut.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45BE5214.7080907@jellydonut.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park ReplyTo: bv@wjv.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on bilver.wjv.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update on buildworld failing with NO_SHARED X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bv@wjv.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:13:55 -0000 Michael Proto said Obscurity in the face of adversity is no dice and while we were trying to figure that out on Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 14:59 he continued with: > Bill Vermillion wrote: > > OK. > > So I tried using the variable documented in > > /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf of NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT. > > I rebuilt the world and kernel [I did not remove the /usr/obj/src > > directory this time - maybe that's it] - but all the files > > in /bin and /sbin are still "dynamically linked (users shared libs, > > stripped) when I run 'file' on them. > > Is this strange, or is it just me. > > Bill > > According to the make.conf(5) manpage and the examples/etc/make.conf > file (at least on my 6.2 box), the knob is NO_DYNAMICROOT, not > NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT. I just checked and I see that. I'd swear it was NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT awhile back. But I just checked on a 6.1 and the ..examples/etc/make.conf does also show that I screwed up - as that was dated on Dec 17, while the one on my 6.2 shows a date of today, about an hour ago, when I installed it all. I feel so ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ / ___|| |_ _ _ __| (_) __| | | | | | \___ \| __| | | |/ _` | |/ _` | | | | | ___) | |_| |_| | (_| | | (_| | |_| |_| |____/ \__|\__,_|\__,_|_|\__,_| (_) (_) Thanks. I'll try not to be so dense next time, but don't hold me to that. Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com