From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 8 8:24:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128FD37B4CF; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 08:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eA8GMxj33122; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:22:59 +0600 (NS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:22:58 +0600 (NS) From: Max Khon To: Don Lewis Cc: "Koster, K.J." , "'Doug Barton'" , "'FreeBSD Hackers mailing list'" Subject: RE: daemon() In-Reply-To: <200011081532.HAA14728@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Don Lewis wrote: > } > > No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything > } > > anymore. > } > } > Then why is it there? To help up the port count? If it's not good, it should > } > be nuked, IMHO. > } > } people still use it because it is smaller > } obrien has already tried to remove it once (in Mar 1999) > } > } as for me -- I do not try to hunt bugs in bash1 and do not blame it. > } my question was about unclosed pipe > > It appears to be a descriptor that your shell failed to close before > execing your test program. Unless you do something out of the ordinary > like run > program 27>somefile > the shell should only leave three descriptors (0, 1, and 2 for stdin, stdout, > and stderr) open when it execs another program. yes, I understand that. My point is that bash1 is still used and comments about braindead people who use it should be redirected to /dev/null. I think we should stop this thread. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message