From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  3 19:08:00 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D91D837B401; Thu,  3 Jul 2003 19:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1E9F843FF9; Thu,  3 Jul 2003 19:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6427wKJ031534;
	Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:07:58 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)h6427vVj031531;
	Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:07:57 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:07:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org
To: Joshua Oreman <oremanj@www.get-linux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030703173035.GH86503@webserver.get-linux.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030703220654.31430A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: gordon@freebsd.org
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 02:08:01 -0000


On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
> > 
> > I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
> > give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
> 
> Well, all I did was test your research :-)

Gordon Tetlow (victim CC'd) was, I believe, working on changes to rc.d to
allow automatic construction of jails at boot, and part of that was some
best practice devfs rules for jail.  Perhaps he could chime in now? :-)

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org      Network Associates Laboratories