Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:22:10 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Ganael LAPLANCHE <martymac@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r335728 - head/benchmarks/bonnie++ Message-ID: <20131206102210.GA78375@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20131206100547.M75091@FreeBSD.org> References: <201312060950.rB69opsI095759@svn.freebsd.org> <20131206095801.GA72543@FreeBSD.org> <20131206095855.GB72543@FreeBSD.org> <20131206100547.M75091@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:10:34AM +0000, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: > On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:58:55 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote > > Although I don't see the reason for PORTREVISION bump... > > Depending on an older version of GCC (by using 'any' version) will > probably lead to different binaries produced, so to a different package > content. Do you think it's overkill to bump the revision for that reason ? Since these bit-stirring changes inside the binary are hardly user-visible, yes, I think it was an overkill. But it does not hurt, of course. I just do not like to rebuild things for no real reason. I mean, if user is happy with installed package (built with gcc46), why force him/her to rebuilt it just for the sake of using different compiler? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131206102210.GA78375>