From nobody Sat Feb 24 15:31:41 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ThrTs62qMz5B19H for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ThrTs06bNz4PnL for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.17.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 41OFVgOF016490 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:31:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.17.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 41OFVgMM016489; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:31:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:31:41 -0800 From: bob prohaska To: David Wolfskill Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing files on -current Message-ID: References: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.09 / 15.00]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.989]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4ThrTs06bNz4PnL On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 07:02:19AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > This is from an amd64 system at main-n268514-61b88a230bac, but > run_rc_scripts is a shell function defined in /etc/rc.subr. > > So the whine about not finding run_rc_scripts would indicate that at > least one of the following is true: > > * The script that should have sourced /etc/rc.subr failed to do so. > > * /etc/rc.csubr is corrupted, and fails to define run_rc_scripts(). > Indeed, it seems to be absent: root@:~ # more /etc/rc.csubr /etc/rc.csubr: No such file or directory root@:~ # However, the same is true of a Pi3 running 14-release p5. It boots reliably once it reaches loader. I wouldn't expect this part of the boot process to be platform dependent. Maybe -current and -release do things differently? > * /etc/rc.subr is missing. Present and accounted for: root@:~ # ls -l /etc/rc.subr -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 51911 Nov 18 21:46 /etc/rc.subr root@:~ # Thanks for writing! bob prohaska