From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 9 11:20:11 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA05146 for current-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 11:20:11 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA05133 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 11:20:03 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA09455; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 11:17:39 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199507091817.LAA09455@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 11:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Cc: phk@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Richard Wackerbarth" at Jul 9, 95 08:43:33 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 616 Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > >("BUILT-950703" ? Hey, He hasn't got the "ls -s panic" patch that > >got comitted on july 5th !) > > "BUILT-950708" -- Does he have it? > > IMHO, "2.1d0803" where 0803 represents the CTM update level > or "2.1d950706" where that represents the date of the source file sup > would be more useful. A) assumes he is using CTM, B) assumes he is using sup, neither may be true (and is certainly not true for me, along with 32 other folks that I know of). -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD