Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 11:17:39 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: phk@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? Message-ID: <199507091817.LAA09455@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <v02120d00ac258c409af8@[199.183.109.242]> from "Richard Wackerbarth" at Jul 9, 95 08:43:33 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> >("BUILT-950703" ? Hey, He hasn't got the "ls -s panic" patch that
> >got comitted on july 5th !)
>
> "BUILT-950708" -- Does he have it?
>
> IMHO, "2.1d0803" where 0803 represents the CTM update level
> or "2.1d950706" where that represents the date of the source file sup
> would be more useful.
A) assumes he is using CTM, B) assumes he is using sup, neither may
be true (and is certainly not true for me, along with 32 other folks
that I know of).
--
Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507091817.LAA09455>