From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 6 19:11:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AD137B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:11:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pursued-with.net (adsl-66-125-9-242.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [66.125.9.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E3843F75 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:11:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net) Received: from pursued-with.net (fffinch [192.168.168.101]) by pursued-with.net (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h173Bt5D014163; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:11:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:11:57 -0800 Subject: Re: disabling sendmail in 5.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG To: David Syphers From: Kevin Stevens In-Reply-To: <200302062105.46152.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thursday, Feb 6, 2003, at 19:05 US/Pacific, David Syphers wrote: >>> sendmail_enable="NO" >> >> make this NONE > > Unfortunately, this is only valid in 4-stable. It was deprecated in > HEAD > September 3, 2002. I was hoping that the sendmail_submit_enable and > sendmail_outbound_enable switches (which I think are new) would have > the same > overall effect as NONE did in -stable. Thank god. I wasn't around at the time, but whoever thought it was a good idea to take a *universally* understood binary choice like yes/no and add alternatives to it - well, hopefully they've had time to appreciate the zillions of posts by confused admins. KeS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message