From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 14:40:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E671065674 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from salfrancl.listas@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D938C8FC17 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1117408bwz.3 for ; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:40:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Cd47/u3RgCx6iF02YBrFiSXwRGXXwno0jHx1rht2Iik=; b=tCUOrMA7S6RS8YVCo/Fp7mIPVAjMgsNhwc/OD0ydKiMHusxR0g/bEqLxcrqqtfv6JH oq4940sReczzEP3af3T9KD+ZiNL54eR/ypwBwzywLgyKIMF61BcBrKePSuvrWk+eUVNv YGb0Qhh5PXttkhePxuqcsAcvnQVhAF1+83+0Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ccEx+CkcRi+ooWG6CKTqxa0K8B+wbz2OLwA1sjRRVqB6pR75pUxAYC8VPfdqp0lSSA ugaB+mznfSdiMbkotdc3C+8UZ2kYDQjRoRDvd28LNFoDpZQdX3Ya/gIQdSTRDXzZTWN2 oQqOjFRD2SN4k8pPftuFQrBiosZfwt8NAdR6g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.102.211 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 07:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:09:56 -0400 Received: by 10.204.82.36 with SMTP id z36mr142362bkk.88.1270822196109; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Leinier Cruz Salfran To: freebsd-hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: c question X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:40:21 -0000 hello all i want to know your oppinions about this: - use a matrix is faster than use a linked list? example: char *szColumnName[10]; unsigned short iColumnAge[10]; struct _llList { struct _llList *prev, *next; char szName[64]; unsigned short iAge; };