From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 20:00:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C35C9D5F6 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@bec.de) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9584117E for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (p200300D2ABCF63104639C4FFFE599710.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:d2:abcf:6310:4639:c4ff:fe59:9710]) (Authenticated sender: joerg@bec.de) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE37117209A for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:00:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:00:14 +0100 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r311109 - head/usr.bin/patch Message-ID: <20170103200014.GA7436@britannica.bec.de> References: <201701021823.v02INWXc028047@repo.freebsd.org> <9c3fc378-ee5e-19ba-c286-1440d4b13615@FreeBSD.org> <20170103102622.GO1923@kib.kiev.ua> <1483458723.16152.107.camel@freebsd.org> <20170103160401.GT1923@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:00:18 -0000 On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > I think this is a valid reason to leave things as they are. FWIW, both > NetBSD and OpenBSD seem be fine with just SHORT_MAX. NetBSD's patch doesn't use (U)SHRT_MAX. Joerg