From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 00:16:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B33106566B; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:16:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@dlink.ua) Received: from smtp.dlink.ua (smtp.dlink.ua [193.138.187.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFD48FC12; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rnote.ddteam.net (131-206-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net [95.133.206.131]) (Authenticated sender: ray) by smtp.dlink.ua (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50C2DC493C; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 02:16:34 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 02:15:49 +0200 From: Aleksandr Rybalko To: PseudoCylon Message-Id: <20120314021549.4ca9a3af.ray@dlink.ua> In-Reply-To: References: <20120313123037.0eb29eb9.ray@dlink.ua> Organization: D-Link X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.2 (GTK+ 2.24.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:16:35 -0000 On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:42:18 -0600 PseudoCylon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko > wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:06 -0600 > > PseudoCylon wrote: > > > >>> > ------------------------------ > >>> > > >>> > Message: 12 > >>> > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:14:23 -0700 > >>> > From: Adrian Chadd > >>> > Subject: Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for > >>> > rt2860/rt3090 To: "Sevan / Venture37" > >>> > Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > >>> > Message-ID: > >>> >         > >>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >>> > > >>> > On 11 March 2012 14:10, Sevan / Venture37 > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> >>> I'll post a new one in a bit. If you want to help, would you > >>> >>> be ok with git as opposed to hg? > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> nope not at all but if its because of familiarity then in this > >>> >> scenario it doesn't make much difference which is used, same > >>> >> work flow, change, commit, push, pull, rinse, repeat. :) > >>> > > >>> > Hiya, > >>> > > >>> > Let's just strip the ^M's from the tree and as long as ray@ and > >>> > pseudocyclon are a-ok with the work thus far, I'll commit it to > >>> > -HEAD. > >>> > > >>> > We can then tidy things up from there. > >>> > > >>> > I just don't want to commit ^M's to the tree, or blatant style > >>> > (9) violations. But we can always tidy things up incrementally > >>> > once they're in the tree. > >>> > > >>> > >>> I've talked about ieee80211_send_bar() with matt, already. > > > > Can you please point me to that discussion? > > > > rt2860_send_bar() is a workaround. Because we patched freebsd > ieee80211_send_bar(), we can simply call it instead of calling the > workaround function on r225013 and up. Thank you! I put it under RT2860_SEND_BAR_WORKAROUND for now. > > > AK -- Aleksandr Rybalko