From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Apr 1 10:26:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E47237B718 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 10:26:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f31HPSC00996; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 10:25:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200104011725.f31HPSC00996@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: "Jason T. Luttgens" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network performance question In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 01 Apr 2001 12:43:21 CDT." <009901c0bad3$3e708080$931576d8@inethouston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 10:25:28 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > FreeBSD kinda disappointed me. It gets ~1000 interface errors on about > > 514000 packets. I switched the 3COM card out for a NetGear FA311 (sis > > driver). After receiving ~310000 packets, the network goes down (can't > > ping/telnet anywhere). At that point I have to ifconfig down and up the > > interface to get it back. You're disappointed in *FreeBSD* because of this? These are *hardware* failures you're describing here... -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message