From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 1 13:18:09 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619EA16A41F for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:18:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231A613C483 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:18:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:08:06 -0400 id 00056407.46B085B6.00001E89 Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:08:05 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070801090805.b3a753fb.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <86hcnjn1bs.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <46AA0491.5000203@gahr.ch> <46ADAF5B.6050602@gahr.ch> <20070730180355.GA7355@rot26.obsecurity.org> <46AE58B5.3080506@gahr.ch> <46AECE8C.8000500@gahr.ch> <86hcnjn1bs.fsf@ds4.des.no> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [patch] enhance powerd(8) to handle max temperature X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:18:09 -0000 In response to "Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav" : > Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > > I cannot see _TC1, _TC2 nor _TSP in your `acpidump -dt' output. > > Further, there is no _PSV definition in anywhere, in the first place. > > It seems to me that your ACPI BIOS doesn't support passive cooling at > > all. >=20 > Going off on a tangent, I too have several motherboards (965P-based) > which do not define any ACPI thermal zones, which leads me to wonder: > what is the preferred way to access thermal data these days? IPMI? Do > we have IPMI support in base or ports? Not sure about the base, but we've been using ipmitool from ports for a while with success, and we're investigating FreeIPMI. --=20 Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 **************************************************************** IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. ****************************************************************