Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 20:43:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 184042] [patch] sysutils/fusefs-kmod backport fuse from head Message-ID: <bug-184042-13-PY80bCBXcj@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-184042-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-184042-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184042 --- Comment #8 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- I'm not sure how to test this. I do know the "post-install" target can be removed. How much risk am I taking if I simple replace the old port with this one? It passes stage checks? (e.g. make check-plist and make stage-qa) ? Does it still apply at this very moment? If you say "no risk" and "yes it does" then I'll probably commit it without testing further. And oh, how usable is the current version of the port right now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-184042-13-PY80bCBXcj>