From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  1 20:43:13 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6024523
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2014 20:43:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD140255C
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2014 20:43:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s71KhDJC031350
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:43:13 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 184042] [patch] sysutils/fusefs-kmod backport fuse from head
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 20:43:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Patch Ready
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-184042-13-PY80bCBXcj@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-184042-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-184042-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 20:43:13 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184042

--- Comment #8 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
I'm not sure how to test this.
I do know the "post-install" target can be removed.

How much risk am I taking if I simple replace the old port with this one?  It
passes stage checks? (e.g. make check-plist and make stage-qa) ?

Does it still apply at this very moment?

If you say "no risk" and "yes it does" then I'll probably commit it without
testing further.


And oh, how usable is the current version of the port right now?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.