From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Mar 25 13:07:22 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA09307
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:07:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA09291
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:07:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA25652; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:49:11 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199703252049.NAA25652@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Cool Web page interface to mail + search engine?
To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty)
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:49:11 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, jfieber@indiana.edu, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org,
        langfod@dihelix.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199703250925.BAA06152@rah.star-gate.com> from "Amancio Hasty" at Mar 25, 97 01:25:37 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >From The Desk Of Terry Lambert :
> > In any case, a known date stamp and Subject line should be enough
> > to thread most data correctly.
> 
> Wrong ! 
> either can be use for a search criteria and thats about it in this mailing
> list. 
> 
> Gosh, I am getting high from whatever you were smoking 8)

Then riddle me this:

How can I reply to a message with a date stamp earlier than the
original message?

It seems to me that threading would be implicit.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.