From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 18 20:23:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1039CFBDE for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACECB186E for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Zd2CL-0003IQ-PZ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:23:57 +0200 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:23:57 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Peter Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got RethinkDB working in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20150918202357.GC36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150911091155.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911152118.GK36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150911162225.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150913202159.GT36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150914094354.GG10833@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150918103346.GA36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150918194816.GP7345@pol-server.leissner.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150918194816.GP7345@pol-server.leissner.se> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:23:56 -0000 Hi! https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203043 > Too bad about 9.3, but this is still great news! > The upgrade from 9.3 to 10.2 seems a much easier step > than the upgrade from 9.3 to 11.0. So if there is no > solution for 9.3, I will try upgrading our server to 10.2. I strongly suggest that you test the application on some testhost before upgrading any production server. Because: 1) I did not do any run-tests and I'm sceptic that it will work out of the box 2) It builds with some /var/lib pathes which still to be changed to proper pathes like /var/db or /var/spool or something. 3) A rc.d script is not yet provided. If you can update the problem report with your tests, that would be very helpful. > In the mean time, I tried compiling in a 10.1 server. I just > unpacked the latest shar and ran make. I got an error that I fixed > by including time.h in src/arch/io/timer/timer_signal_provider.hpp, > but then I got "error: use of undeclared identifier 'ppoll'" in > src/arch/runtime/event_queue/poll.cc. This error I think I can't > fix, because it seems that ppoll doesn't exist until 10.2. Thanks for that pointer! So we need to mark the port as limited to 10.2 and newer. > So I > will upgrade that 10.1 server to 10.2 this weekend or next week, > and try compiling again in 10.2. Wonderful. Please report back on the run-tests! -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !