From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  9 11:03:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8753116A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Nov 2004 11:03:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FE443D41
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Nov 2004 11:03:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de)
Received: from hoppel.local (port-212-202-38-171.dynamic.qsc.de
	[212.202.38.171])
	by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30328123969
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Nov 2004 12:01:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1])
	by hoppel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C6E6144
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Nov 2004 12:05:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hoppel.local ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.efacilitas.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 44069-03 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
 Tue,  9 Nov 2004 12:05:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2])
	by hoppel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3ED6142
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Nov 2004 12:05:49 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEvDtm5pZw==?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:07:10 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
Thread-Index: AcTGTEImqah7tAm2T1uQn69ILpdudA==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Message-Id: <20041109110549.DC3ED6142@hoppel.local>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alpha-tierchen.de
Subject: Re: standard-supfile = stable-supfile with 5.3 ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:03:01 -0000

Rob wrote:

> If so, then why do we have a standard-supfile and a stable-supfile
> doing the same thing? If both bring you -STABLE, one of the two seems
> to be redundant to me and having two sup files doing the same only
> causes confusion.

Maybe you're right. There is a kind of redundancy now, but these two =
files brought not always the same. It would be more confusing if you =
have two different files and someday one them is missing, because =
someone deleted it.

Bj=C3=B6rn