From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 10 04:08:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C504B16A407; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7BF43D46; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:08:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A24F1A3C1F; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73F8B5148C; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:08:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:08:34 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20060910040834.GA75404@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20060909231448.E1031@ganymede.hub.org> <20060910024047.GA73879@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060910005505.H1031@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060910005505.H1031@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Mark Andrews , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:08:41 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:55:42AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> > >>This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding w= as > >>that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed > >>stable ... > > > >You mean like in the FreeBSD handbook? It's not anyone else's fault > >if you haven't read the documentation. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stabl= e.html >=20 > I swear, the last time I searched for a definition of STABLE vs=20 > CURRENT/HEAD, that wsan't there ... but, granted, that was a very very=20 > long time ago ... Well, now you know. Might be a good idea to reread the handbook and other documentation to bring yourself up to date on anything else you might have missed too. Kris --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFA4/BWry0BWjoQKURAhjaAJ9giikk23NfqZKvR6QtYpRmwF2SwgCfdH/L +3209rwivvoEBnR8Aqgyfsk= =MYbA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--