From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 23 14:27:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3E216A4B3 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138FB43FAF for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:27:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from homer.softweyr.com (corp-2.ipinc.com [199.245.188.2]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38C372E15; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:23:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr To: Charles Swiger , net@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:27:32 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310231427.32197.wes@softweyr.com> Subject: Re: Help Broadcasting a UDP packet on the LAN:URGENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:27:28 -0000 On Thursday 23 October 2003 12:39, Charles Swiger wrote: > > Also, Barney's comments here: > ...make sense to me as well, for whatever that may be worth.... :-) Worth a lot, actually. If we can get 4 people looking at the problem from such diverse viewpoints and come to a point where we all agree (at least that it sucks less than the alternatives) the design is probably not too far off in the ozone. Now we just have to let Bruce implement it. Where *did* I put that intercontinental bullwhip???? ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/