From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 24 1:34: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79E837B479 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yahoo-inc.com (Studded@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA84441; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:33:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@yahoo-inc.com) Message-ID: <39F54972.F8CDFFFE@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:33:54 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-102 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, imp@village.org Subject: Re: /usr/src/UPDATING does not reflect /etc/defaults/rc.conf References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD wrote: > > In /usr/src/UPDATING: > > 20000907: > Networking defaults have been tightened. Anybody upgrading > /etc/defaults/rc.conf needs to add the following lines to > /etc/rc.conf if they want to have the same setup > afterwards (unless the variables already are set, of course): > # Enable network daemons for user convenience. > inetd_enable="YES" > portmap_enable="YES" > sendmail_enable="YES" > > And yet /etc/defaults/rc.conf has all three already enabled. The rc files > loads /etc/defaults/rc.conf before looking at /etc/rc.conf, which in a > default install does not exist. Does this mean that the 20000907 entry in > /etc/src/UPDATING was in error? Or was it simply never committed? The MFC for this never occurred. One or the other should be updated to reflect reality before 4.2... Doug -- "The dead cannot be seduced." - Kai, "Lexx" Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message