Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 19:10:49 -0700 From: David Johnson <david@usermode.org> To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LibH or Anaconda ?? Message-ID: <200405241910.49207.david@usermode.org> In-Reply-To: <BAY19-F18Ut65BVEpVR0000c430@hotmail.com> References: <BAY19-F18Ut65BVEpVR0000c430@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 23 May 2004 08:52 pm, =D0=A1 =B7=C9=E7=E7 wrote: > So , why don't you guys to think about migration rather than > rewriting a completely > different architecture for the installer ? Anaconda is certainly an option, but I doubt a binary-only Anaconda is.=20 Think about it. We need to go beyond running Redhat's installer in=20 Linux compatibility mode. Also. SuSE just open sourced their YaST=20 installer. That's an option as well. =2D-=20 David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405241910.49207.david>