From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Mar 3 16:18:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C942B37B719 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 16:18:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vcardona@home.com) Received: from marx.marvic.chum ([24.17.229.11]) by femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010304001834.YPEX811.femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com@marx.marvic.chum> for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 16:18:34 -0800 Received: (from vcardona@localhost) by marx.marvic.chum (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f240JN808010 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 18:19:23 -0600 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 18:19:23 -0600 From: "Victor R. Cardona" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Considering FreeBSD Message-ID: <20010303181923.A7927@marx.marvic.chum> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010303142158.A16878@linux.rainbow> <001001c0a40f$3f091b40$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <001001c0a40f$3f091b40$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>; from tedm@toybox.placo.com on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:24:55AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:24:55AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Nonsense! I've run Solaris on Intel for a while and it supports > plenty of hardware, although less "desktop" hardware than "server" > hardware. But, I don't see that it's any more stable than FreeBSD > and the lack of source is a detriment compared to FreeBSD. Isn't Solaris x86 somewhat unstable? I heard that it had some serious memory problems. - v -- Victor R. Cardona vcardona@home.com "Behold the keyboard of Kahless, the greatest Klingon code warrior that ever lived!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message