From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 24 04:01:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D743016A41F for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 04:01:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBEA43D4C for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 04:01:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8O41KUK014977 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:01:20 -0700 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20050923204756.02e3eeb0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:00:15 -0700 To: mchartzell@getdts.com, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <4334C922.2050105@earthlink.net> References: <4334C922.2050105@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Adaptec 2120 performance very poor - What now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 04:01:24 -0000 At 08:33 PM 9/23/2005, Matt Hartzell wrote: >I am experiencing very poor performance on an Adaptec 2120, and I >can see that (now) the 2120 is not a good choice for a highly used ftp server. > >Now that I have about 500G of data stored on it I really can't back >it up and rebuild it using some other controller. > >I know the 2200 can be swapped out for the 2120 with out rebuilding >the array, but in my testing the 2200 is just as poor when witting >to reading / writing to the same channel. > >What other products would provide faster performance under FreeBSD >AND support a seamless (no rebuild/reinstall/restore) migration? I noticed the same thing with the 2120 cards that I've used in a number of systems. Interestingly the first time I saw the performance problem was on a machine with FreeBSD 5.3. All the other systems I had used the 2120 cards in were 4.x. I ran a variety of comparisons between 4.x and 5.x using the exact same hardware, and saw approximately a 3:1 difference in sustained throughput, with the 4.x systems being faster. Eventually I narrowed it down to the way newfs in 5.x was creating ufs1 file systems. If I created the file system in 4.x and then mounted it in 5.x, performance between the two versions was nearly identical, with both measuring the same as only 4.x had done previously. I posted a few times to this list and one of the others, but didn't get much response. Eventually other factors made the performance difference moot, so I stopped pursuing it. If anyone is interested, I can probably dig up most of the test data that I had, and give more detail about what I actually found. -Glenn >Thanks in advance for any and all help. > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"