From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 13 21:06:07 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AEE16A420;
	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jp@tns.cz)
Received: from bonifac.tns.cz (sodat1-51.bm.gin.cz [213.194.214.51])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E93413C457;
	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jp@tns.cz)
Received: by bonifac.tns.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id CE4ABF1996; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:30:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:30:12 +0100
From: Josef Pojsl <jp@tns.cz>
To: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
Message-ID: <20080213203012.GB1157@bonifac.tns.cz>
References: <jV/l2UkZT+CCNuE6npJv1SBs5CE@UCvaDHSF+GDEPQ7TSpdR+lgUSQM>
	<20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<20080207141422.GG11393@diehard.n-r-g.com>
	<20080206144104.GL1122@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<jV/l2UkZT+CCNuE6npJv1SBs5CE@UCvaDHSF+GDEPQ7TSpdR+lgUSQM>
	<20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<Ntfg81bhcEB6BPmKzMb2iTN9oBA@ebJhc+9glC7W5vxxBJVH9quBZr0>
	<BeIqwBu0LkRXuGRr9c834oJe11M@mkgs2gFQr6GPddtmfyJSxMBvIxA>
	<20080208105357.GF1142@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<BT4TiDDxXXg+A3Hm/RZG4ajuso0@iW7JDlNxJglv8iYoJTWnPBJ0iaQ>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BT4TiDDxXXg+A3Hm/RZG4ajuso0@iW7JDlNxJglv8iYoJTWnPBJ0iaQ>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, farrokhi@FreeBSD.org,
	Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com>
Subject: Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:06:07 -0000

Hello Eygene,

On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:37:29PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Found another OpenBSD/FreeBSD discrepancy: FreeBSD wants to see IP
> header's length in the native host order, when it sends the packets
> with sendmsg().  Corrected the patch and tried it on my test setup
> with Qemu: it worked in the configuration that is simular to yours.
> But one exception: my interfaces are not point-to-point, because
> it is too late to get VPNs up and running for today ;))  So it will
> be very good if you will be able to test the new version.
> 
> Attached is the modified patch for the port itself and the modified
> file 'files/patch-ospfd_packet.c': it is the only changed file from
> the previous version of my patch.  So, if you had already patched
> the port to 4.2 with previous version, just drop patch-ospfd_packet.c
> into the 'files/' directory and rebuild the patch.

Thanks for that patch. I have replaced patch-ospfd_packet.c with the new one,
and OSPF packets can find their way through again now. Unfortunately,
the behavior is the same as with openospfd 4.0; it converges with right costs etc.,
but with the wrong interface. Everything is exactly the same.

--
Josef