Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:23:37 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
To:        Drew Eckhardt <drew@PoohSticks.ORG>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: syscall assembly 
Message-ID:  <200012132323.eBDNNb588363@earth.backplane.com>
References:   <200012132309.eBDN9eh29153@chopper.Poohsticks.ORG>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:>
:>gcc tries to align stack to 16 byte boundaries as a speed
:>optiminzation.  Why it doesn't do this in one instruction is beyond
:>me.
:
:Kocking 16 bytes off the stack pointer won't put it any closer to a 
:16 byte boundary.  

    This is precisely my problem with gcc's 'optimization'.  It's
    utterly stupid for it to assume that the stack is already
    16-byte aligned... it makes it impossible to mix aligned and
    non-aligned code and still have a reasonably optimal result
    (e.g. like third party libraries or older libraries or
    whatever).  And it's a huge, unnecessary waste of space
    when most of the time all you are storing on the stack are
    ints.

					-Matt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012132323.eBDNNb588363>