Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 05:26:17 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org Cc: dillon@earth.backplane.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. Message-ID: <3A9BAAF9.C75B39BF@elischer.org> References: <200102260529.f1Q5T8413011@curve.dellroad.org> <200102261755.f1QHtvr34064@earth.backplane.com> <200102270624.WAA17949@c62443-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Arun Sharma wrote:
>
> On 26 Feb 2001 18:56:18 +0100, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> wrote:
> > Ha. Right. Go through any piece of significant code and just see how
> > much goes flying out the window because the code wants to simply assume
> > things work. Then try coding conditionals all the way through to fix
> > it... and don't forget you need to propogate the error condition back
> > up the procedure chain too so the original caller knows why it failed.
>
> So, it all comes down to reimplementing the UNIX kernel in a language
> that supports exceptions, just like Linus suggested :)
I've often considered writing a language SPECIFICALLY for writing the kernel.
(no other uses)
I mean it basically uses the same mechaninsims over and over and over again...
linked lists, hash tables, nested loops, etc.etc.
I'd like a language that lets me define the module I'm writing,
define the way it should behave, and let the boring code be taken care of
by itelf :-)
>
> -Arun
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ julian@elischer.org
( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001
---> X_.---._/
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A9BAAF9.C75B39BF>
