From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 11 11:28:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533346A3 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailsec119.isp.belgacom.be (mailsec119.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A70BD5 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:28:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=wisUSL2q+2X910teRg2xg/30tBFW7lBMAi45pEFXNHU= c=1 sm=2 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=H1YVN86-igj4Lzrrnt4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=1KCJa2O9tLIA:10 a=GMJpgf_DBfwA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Uj-3PbXrKgkKKspFDngA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=p403mkujtbAA:10 a=1TM7i2lP1nUA:10 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2D2HQBTJgBV/9EU7sMZAkGDBiIwg2W6Q4V1AYcpTQEBAQEBAXyEBjNrCQEwDgKBA4giijWSQIdGiASGU5RmkCKCFwwvEoEzBa1vI4FFDIIePYJ0AQEB Received: from mailrmu001.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.20.209]) by privrelay.isp.belgacom.be with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2015 12:28:33 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:28:31 +0100 (CET) From: Benny Goemans Reply-To: Benny Goemans To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1839928617.915747.1426073311674.open-xchange@webmail.nmp.proximus.be> Subject: 11.0-CURRENT Beagle Bone Black No NIC? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Medium X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.2.2-Rev27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:28:41 -0000 Just wondering. I've tested the latest image (r279813) this weekend and noticed that I didn't see the internal network interface anymore. Previous images worked correctly. It might be a regression, but could always mean there's something wrong with my device. So, am I the only one with this issue and the latest image? Benny Goemans From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 11 14:21:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837939BE for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gromit.dlib.vt.edu (gromit.dlib.vt.edu [128.173.126.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gromit.dlib.vt.edu", Issuer "Chumby Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56DD42CE for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pmather.lib.vt.edu (pmather.lib.vt.edu [128.173.126.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gromit.dlib.vt.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EA62150; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:21:44 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT Beagle Bone Black No NIC? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Paul Mather X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <1839928617.915747.1426073311674.open-xchange@webmail.nmp.proximus.be> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:21:43 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1839928617.915747.1426073311674.open-xchange@webmail.nmp.proximus.be> To: Benny Goemans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:21:51 -0000 On Mar 11, 2015, at 7:28 AM, Benny Goemans = wrote: > Just wondering. I've tested the latest image (r279813) this weekend = and noticed > that I didn't see the internal network interface anymore. Previous = images worked > correctly. It might be a regression, but could always mean there's = something > wrong with my device. So, am I the only one with this issue and the = latest > image? I can't speak for the latest image, but I just finished a native build = and install of -CURRENT on my Beaglebone Black and the NIC is working = fine: root@beaglebone:/home/pmather # uname -a FreeBSD beaglebone 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1 r279828: Tue Mar = 10 09:35:58 EDT 2015 = pmather@beaglebone:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEAGLEBONE-NO_WITNESS arm root@beaglebone:/home/pmather # ifconfig cpsw0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 options=3D8000b ether 90:59:af:55:26:eb inet 10.23.5.30 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.23.5.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3D600003 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 groups: lo nd6 options=3D21 (I'm logged in via SSH right now.) Cheers, Paul.