Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:23:55 +1000 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> To: Alphons van Werven <freebsd@skysmurf.nl>, Kevin Golding <kpg@caomhin.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: blanket portmgr approval vs. non-fixing changes Message-ID: <cc7333ac-0582-2012-002b-f0f9a8fa0e8e@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20160628110322.GA51760@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <201606272021.u5RKLVhQ057899@slippy.cwsent.com> <op.yjrc3knw57n2so@thoth.home> <20160628110322.GA51760@spectrum.skysmurf.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28/06/2016 9:03 PM, Alphons van Werven wrote: > Maintainers are already notified by e-mail of commits resulting from PRs > because they are put on the CC list. Maybe it's just me, but I think it > would be very nice if maintainers were *always* automagically notified of > *any* commits to their ports, including those subject to blanket approval. Good idea, as long as people could opt-in/out as appropriate. > With any luck, such notifications are received in time to prevent (or at > least limit) wasted time such as in the above case. Moreover, keeping > maintainers informed also eliminates having to wonder "Ey, what's this > 'ere then?" the next time they look at their ports. And finally, I'd > surmise it would also help keeping maintainers abreast of developments in > the ports infrastructure in general. > > I know that the PR notifications come from BugZilla and not from SVN, so > what I don't know is how feasible it is rig up something like this, but I > do know that I for one would quite appreciate something along these lines. Quite feasible, hit me up off list and we can discuss further :) ./koobs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cc7333ac-0582-2012-002b-f0f9a8fa0e8e>