From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 27 18:35:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EBA14D6E for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 18:35:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA19827; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 11:05:01 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3.1 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199910280125.UAA81599@celery.dragondata.com> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 11:05:00 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Kevin Day Subject: Re: Running unattended (ifo FFS thread) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, (Remy Nonnenmacher) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 28-Oct-99 Kevin Day wrote: > > This means that it generally always gets through the fsck.. Of course if > > had to delete files then they're gone, but if you value its ability to stay > > without human intervention its handy. > The problem is that 'fsck -py' ignores the 'p' and will fsck every time, > even if it's unneeded. This takes ages for me. I believe I submitted a PR > with a 'fix' to fsck. Yeah, the machines we have don't get shutdown except for a power failure so that wasn't a problem :) I'll have a look for your PR tho. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message