From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 27 11:21:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C1C16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:21:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABB743D4C for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:21:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A4D0B.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.77.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j8RBLlxr040434 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:21:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (fire.jhs.private [192.168.91.41]) by js.berklix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8RBLiGF003485 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:21:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (localhost.jhs.private [127.0.0.1]) by fire.jhs.private (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8RBLoXg013222 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:21:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.jhs.private) Received: (from jhs@localhost) by fire.jhs.private (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j8RBLo0A013221; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:21:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:21:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200509271121.j8RBLo0A013221@fire.jhs.private> To: current@freebsd.org From: "Julian Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com Munich Unix, BSD, Internet Consultancy Fcc: sent-mail User-agent: EXMH http://beedub.com/exmh/ on FreeBSD http://freebsd.org X-URL: http://berklix.com/~jhs/ Cc: Subject: Negative disc usage from /bin/df 6.0-BETA5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:21:51 -0000 6.0-BETA5 /bin/df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s4a 253678 91884 141500 39% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/ad0s4d 253678 141418 91966 61% /var /dev/ad0s4e 253678 -272 233656 -0% /tmp /dev/ad0s4f 5421722 3255960 1732026 65% /usr 108% is plausible when eg root has eaten most of the reserve allowed by eg 'newfs -m 10', but ... Negative disc usage just doesnt look right ! Julian -- Julian Stacey. Consultant Unix Net & Sys. Eng., Munich. http://berklix.com Mail Ascii not HTML. Ihr Rauch = meine allergischen Kopfschmerzen.