Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Aug 1995 04:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Cc:        joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Broken find??
Message-ID:  <199508191127.EAA29521@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
In-Reply-To: <4650.808829464@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Aug 19, 95 03:51:04 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> > > root@time-> find . -x -print
> > > find: -x: unknown option
> > 
> > Find's pretty :) syntax differentiates clearly between options and
> > (minute... must RTFM first...) `primaries'.  So better write:
> > 
> > 	find -x . -print
> 
> Oh yuck.  That's mutant!  OK, I withdraw my "bug report".  Thanks!

And the old form primary of -xdev still works, and is even in the
manual page, finally found it down in the bottom crap.

> > (where the -print is obsolescent in 4.4BSD, if you are a lazy type
> > [and i know you are :)]).
> 
> Hey! I'd get upset about that, but it's too much work.. :-)

:-).  I always hated the fact that -print was required, makes the
default action of find pretty usless except for a good disk drive
test program :-).


-- 
Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company                 Reliable computers for FreeBSD



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508191127.EAA29521>