From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Nov 24 8:55: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl.sentex.ca (vinyl.sentex.ca [209.112.4.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA391522E for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 08:55:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite-atm.sentex.ca [209.112.4.1]) by vinyl.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA48276 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:54:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simoeon (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA04244 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:54:30 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991124115256.01bcc920@staff.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@staff.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:52:56 -0500 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: patches, fixes, regression errors and Olympic dives (was Re: speaking of 3.4... ) In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19991124021424.00a59c30@nsit-popmail.uchicago.edu > References: <2049.943380341@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Posted to NTBugtraq, its title is "What is NT 4.0 SP6a?". To me, the subtitle is, "Why I love, love, love CVSUP and the method used to track STABLE" If it didnt effect us as we have to use NT for some of our customers, its almost laughable... Reading it makes me think of Olympic diving... So, whats the technical difficulty level of a double reverse regression and a SYN fix. http://ntbugtraq.ntadvice.com/sp6a.asp ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message