From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 01:57:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9241106566B; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:57:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (gatekeeper-int.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e002::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996FB8FC13; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alph.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e010:862b:2bff:febc:8956]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.allbsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0A1urwq036352; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:57:03 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.allbsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0A1up85070426; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:56:52 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:56:47 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120110.105647.2218023206500143768.hrs@allbsd.org> To: feld@feld.me From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: <20120110.040224.1057547871207328114.hrs@allbsd.org> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3.51 on Emacs 23.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_10_10_56_47_2012_244)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::32]); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:57:04 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.6 required=13.0 tests=BAYES_00, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gatekeeper.allbsd.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: accepting rtadv broken on 9-STABLE, re driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:57:16 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_10_10_56_47_2012_244)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mark Felder wrote in : fe> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:02:24 -0600, Hiroki Sato fe> wrote: fe> fe> > re0 seems to have ACCEPT_RTADV. What is the problem? fe> fe> That's because I haven't rebooted.... fe> fe> Let's start fresh. fe> fe> The normal ipv6 configuration anyone would use: fe> fe> -ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES" in rc.conf fe> fe> -NO mention of net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv in sysctl.conf fe> fe> I boot up, re0 *does not* have ACCEPT_RTADV. This is an expected behavior. ACCEPT_RTADV is disabled by default on 9.X. fe> I try forcing via the sysctl: net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv=1 fe> fe> Still doesn't work! This needs a reboot. Did you reboot the box? fe> Why? What makes this machine different? All the other machines I run fe> do not require this to get ACCEPT_RTADV. Is it the re driver? My other fe> machines have em and ath interfaces. Putting the following line net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv=1 into /etc/sysctl.conf, and then removing the following line ipv6_ifconfig_re0="inet6 accept_rtadv" should work, I think. (Of course a reboot is needed after that). -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_10_10_56_47_2012_244)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk8Lmt8ACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1aBwCggmuaf14QUdlQz+KZGCZUdj1T bHIAn1m8ZIcSvsFMDvMXdZbVKjX2Q03i =HzrJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Jan_10_10_56_47_2012_244)----