From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 18:50:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989C1EF4 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:50:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dt71@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E9AD2A5A for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [157.181.98.186] ([157.181.98.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQiB3-1VDiWt0kqT-00U0Ck for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:50:10 +0100 Message-ID: <5277EC42.1020709@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:49:38 +0100 From: dt71@gmx.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Percival , FreeBSD Hackers , FreeBSD current Subject: Re: Automated submission of kernel panic reports: sysutils/panicmail References: <527779ED.9040303@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <527779ED.9040303@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Dry9WEGnJDpmjBYIttVkKm/+tdPX2EbeMfavbkO0kYxvAol/Hx5 TLiD38bEPFtkBplmxVeDVvCdrwnHdaoOSXtgANIwQ6ZkVqHuybn9/LPbQBqjUT8qWvZSGUB SlWJnpdSM2t9ruDmKibEns6qUrqv8J00laUgGeG5BsSOkgp5pPfPGhuTqMYNrjuiPwB16On ra0LfhZrt4gAnwYmDTZNg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:50:12 -0000 Colin Percival wrote, On 11/04/2013 11:41: > After considerable review on freebsd-hackers (thanks dt71 and jilles!) I have > now added sysutils/panicmail to the FreeBSD ports tree. The pkesh script is probably still in need of a big review (S00N(TM)...).