From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Apr 14 00:10:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E665F1CE8 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from winterny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FKjYS2h9Cz3njT; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from winterny@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id d23so7750855qko.12; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:10:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:disposition-notification-to:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=X7bY2x3Oe45nc+dSzRuyzUWLQgxYSLipawuRQlnC9bA=; b=YRjAYcBKUJNl0j3T6lOK5xm2yaOxEKcCq93diQ+iTL20rX5+e3kQsWTBMyMbkTIalK stimlzuu/yd+o6Et3TUaONzpQTFS1ybT0BzHmmUFW018dyKXy+f01dbKyu5G0EbEhwt3 AJQbIEx33UOCPidhH06MQX3YTlY1swA7aJLIy9WpWyIVpX+PQj6t5CD8HwXcMv2SJBFh 8CoLXvmMyUJKp+22sMDm3aadprAABcZM7ZCE8UKrshppuSgBfiQ6j2xKG4zHuiJ6iLin MqiFEfuBsirVTLo6BeT6ne5oU96GVUMyMnoygLLRBTZWmpn36yBT0fJvj4nVDwq/jaVC mYNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:disposition-notification-to :from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=X7bY2x3Oe45nc+dSzRuyzUWLQgxYSLipawuRQlnC9bA=; b=E4oltx3TYUZZZABQz23pXt/X9COkGkP4AT4EoXxLlZqykTK155Vfl3cKXXSG0owDqN dGNmkLNxDbZSyA2r36HqDMDBCSCknYCxUbMU9t8vbPQpaqXigNo90ibFFupVf/whsUX9 f19/1LsaOozd4OD124mwhFqoWV47JmYW+FqoIPRMPchWk4goyI7AxaoleYgKTFDe4zuh gOwzUa+dByGAcq5fCI5ICx3l46CnFoG0Qotq3EYn7hMASg3FceLaUHPXBkYJW1y3U4im 3ZVHUD4LCk60YIqNeZQlzHSk6iHmRP5j5yi5wixr9pBq7ByE7WsrBCzreeBqyGGHurFc dRQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532J7f7JVDD5nOryERQUMi/1jwaDJ7i/+MpgUC7Josl2rjBTfWI+ qNbvbjmaOTRkM7z/QF8AF6EFoJspxHpBHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwbNjUhBLYkcneQHB13SiVW0C67kKl2Pve94EYtCwC79Ub9bxtblMBWvKDDmD2wgOh6+7RKw== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:dcc1:: with SMTP id q184mr2656654qkf.482.1618359051143; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:10:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:881:8181:4930:11fc:c220:512c:6149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k26sm11431484qkg.120.2021.04.13.17.10.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Subject: Re: All transmits on txq0 on an ix interface - why no balancing? From: Phil Rosenthal In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 20:10:50 -0400 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-Id: <8923AD0B-1E58-4F7C-AEF5-E9A30D3F9F2C@gmail.com> References: To: =?utf-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=C3=A9?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FKjYS2h9Cz3njT X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:10:52 -0000 > On Apr 13, 2021, at 8:07 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labb=C3=A9 = wrote: >=20 > Are you exiting through a tunnel interface (GRE, GIF, PPPoE, IPsec, = OpenVPN, etc.) ? No. I am running PF/Altq for NAT and Traffic shaping. One port is using a Multirate 2.5G SFP+ (linked at 2.5G) to connect to a = cablemodem The other port is linked to a 10G DAC to a Juniper switch The goal is to be able to get the 1.44 Gbps provisioned speeds from = Comcast, but it seems that bursts over 1.3Gbps cause a small amount of = packet loss which causes speeds to drop back down. -Phil=