From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Nov 7 09:33:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2901011219EA; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2607:f740:d:20::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876878A0FD; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:33:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42qh6R4KvxzDj1l; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:33:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([IPv6:::1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id 0BhHp9nwRA4T; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (host-90-236-10-204.mobileonline.telia.com [90.236.10.204]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42qh6Q1rwszDhFd; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: svn commit: r484357 - head/mail/spamassassin To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: Koichiro Iwao , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201811062146.wA6LknN3005274@repo.freebsd.org> <20181107083105.55o52urafcgdthec@ivaldir.net> <20181107091004.xbvzfyviyrkcbi2m@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20181107092211.dgcvichyunbss35x@ivaldir.net> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: <2b3670de-7625-d458-7c93-5ea0a7ae2af1@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:33:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181107092211.dgcvichyunbss35x@ivaldir.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 876878A0FD X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-103.11 / 200.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ALLOW_DOMAIN_WHITELIST(-100.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx66.freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[204.10.236.90.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 09:33:05 -0000 On 11/7/18 10:22 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> On 11/7/18 10:10 AM, Koichiro Iwao wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:31:05AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> Is there still a need for the japanese spamassassin? if yes, can't the specific >>>> patch be incorporated in the regular one? >>>> >>>> That would simplify the life of many people to have only one spamassassin >>>> >>>> Bapt >>> >>> AFAIK yes. Additional patch improves spam detection accuracy on emails written >>> in Japanese but using mail/spamassassin's accuracy is not too bad. >>> >>> Regarding the current japanese/spamassassin port, I think it is deprecated. It >>> is created for the old version of spamassassin and not updated for years. >>> >>> I can found another Japanese tokenizer patch for the latest >>> spamassassin. The port should be renewed based on this: >>> >>> https://github.com/heartbeatsjp/spamassassin_ja >>> >> >> Hi! >> japanese/spamassassin is up for grabs. If you are interested in maintaining >> it and in updating it with that patch, I can help a little. I don't have >> time to maintain it myself. >> Regards > > Can't those patches be available in the files directory on the > mail/spamassassins so we have one single port to maintain? > I don't know why japanese/spamassassin was made into a separate port to begin with, it's been that way since I took over maintainership over mail/spamassassin. Looking at SVN history it seems like japanese/spamassassin was created because the patch was for an older version of spamassassin originally, so two different versions were needed. Regards -- Niclas Zeising