From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 18:30:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129661065688; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcm@fuzzwad.org) Received: from mail.volente.us (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7:d47::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88248FC19; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shiny-w0.fuzzwad.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.volente.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q26IUiVG080113; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:30:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rcm@fuzzwad.org) Message-ID: <4F5657D4.3070009@fuzzwad.org> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:30:44 -0600 From: Ron McDowell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Teske References: <0b7101ccfb32$58d459f0$0a7d0dd0$@fisglobal.com> <20120306091003.GA77008@freebsd.org> <0bbc01ccfbc4$60904090$21b0c1b0$@fisglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <0bbc01ccfbc4$60904090$21b0c1b0$@fisglobal.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:48:51 +0000 Cc: 'Alexander Best' , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PREVIEW] bsdconfig(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:30:47 -0000 Not sure this will get to -hackers, I'm not on their list. More below... On 3/6/12 12:10 PM, Devin Teske wrote: >> 3) when bsdconfig starts the note regarding the packages shouldn't state >> "Pascal". most people probably don't know what pascal is. ;) how about >> VirtualBox or chromium? these packages are probably used by a lot more >> users. > ^_^ Agreed. Ron, can we change this? > > Thoughts: I'm thinking that we should name some high-visibility software here. > Say... Firefox :-D That text was snagged verbatim from sysinstall. I'm open to any changes there. >> 4) do we really need fdisk and disklabel? hasn't freebsd moved onto gpart >> and glabel? >> > I've been thinking about this a lot lately. > > I've been thinking that we should combine the Fdisk and DiskLabel menus into a > single menu that calls sade(8). > > Thoughts? I'd agree with that for the 10.0 version. For 9.x I'd rather see them separate as that's the way they are in sysinstall. Make sense? -- Ron McDowell San Antonio TX