From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Apr 18 10:59:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from rhadamanth.submonkey.net (pc4-card4-0-cust162.cdf.cable.ntl.com [80.4.14.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5569837B419 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from setantae by rhadamanth.submonkey.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 16yGBp-0001Ri-00; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:59:25 +0100 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:59:25 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Justin Honold Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tact Message-ID: <20020418175925.GA5384@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Justin Honold , doc@freebsd.org References: <001901c1e702$17333fb0$3200a8c0@internal.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001901c1e702$17333fb0$3200a8c0@internal.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:54:29PM -0500, Justin Honold wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/backup-programs.ht > ml > > is mentioning the world trade center really necessary to emphasize the > importance of offsite backups? It's not referring to the same incident. That part of the document predates September 11th, 2001. We've discussed this here before, and the general consensus (which I personally agree with) was that it remains a good example, even after the event you're concerned with (perhaps even more so). Others may (and probably do) feel otherwise. Ceri -- get the cool shoe shine To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message