From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 20 21:18:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA21017
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dima@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA21010
          Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:18:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199603210518.VAA21010@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: X11R6.1
To: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 21:18:46 -0800 (PST)
Cc: dima@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199603201544.IAA07669@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Mar 20, 96 08:44:00 am
From: dima@FreeBSD.ORG (Dima Ruban)
X-Class: Fast
Organization: HackerDome
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Nate Williams writes:
> 
> > What about to add X11R6.1 to ldconfig search paths in /etc/rc?
> > Anybody has anything against it? If not, I'll commit it.
> 
> Why is it needed?  Is it going to be a standard path for things, or will

Becasue X11R6.1 is out.
And this is good question about standard. This is default
(standard) project root for X11R6.1, but as I've heard, XFree86 
guys are going to stay with /usr/X11R6 path.

So, this is basically up to us to decide.

> the /usr/X11R6 path suffice for all X11R6 binaries?
> 
> (I'm partial to the latter)
> 
> 
> Nate
> 

-- dima