From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 18:28:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E725816A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:28:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC4F43D2D for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:28:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C408D72DD4; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:28:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C158272DCB; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:28:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:28:41 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Tristan In-Reply-To: <20050215101842.5823080a@rhino> Message-ID: <20050215102827.E28871@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20050214110826.56fa6cf3@rhino> <20050215101842.5823080a@rhino> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum or vinum in 5.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:28:42 -0000 On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Tristan wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:08:26 +1030 > Tristan wrote: > > > > can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is > > in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum > > ready for production use in a RAID5 config ? > > Does this limitation still exist (from 5.3 ERRATA): > While some uncommon configurations, such as multiple vinum > drives on a disk, are not supported.... Yes. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org