Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:51:08 +0100 From: "Jack Raats" <jack@jarasoft.net> To: "Vivek Khera" <vivek@khera.org>, "FreeBSD Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Numerous unpleasant surprises in latest portupgrade Message-ID: <002c01c86da8$3b187110$0202fea9@jarasoft.net> References: <20080212091754.28821ab4@serene.no-ip.org> <56D7E0B4-4DA5-46CE-BB25-C6600FFE20D1@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I have noticed it doesn't chase *any* dependencies that need upgrading > if the base port specified doesn't need updating. For example, if pcre > is outdated and I do "portupgrade -Rrv postfix" it will do nothing unless > postfix itself needs updating too, even though it is a dependency. > > This is very un-useful behavior. try portupgrade -Na and it tries to upgrade portsI never installed... That's strange behaviour... Jack -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959 iD8DBQFHseqdPh5RwW/NzC4RAne4AJ0cCFur9ZUfe/Bp0SUyB/UWviNl1wCgwxai Qkg7XEvBOz3B2HE0JoTv8a0= =jZ/f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002c01c86da8$3b187110$0202fea9>