From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 24 13:59:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553E4106566C for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas@goodking.ca) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AED8FC0C for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas@goodking.ca) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so95346qwd.7 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.81.74 with SMTP id w10mr1320016vck.29.1245851960089; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from goodking.goodking.ca (host-216-211-94-41.tbaytel.net [216.211.94.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm2274683yxe.166.2009.06.24.06.59.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Thomas Abthorpe From: Thomas Abthorpe Organization: FreeBSD.GoodKing.Ca To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:59:15 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net> <20090623213516.GQ64856@carrick.bishnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20090623213516.GQ64856@carrick.bishnet.net> X-Face: /|[9,PbEOB6g>?2^*Sc|"~6:Ro"O>Nv\Rfkv\42g)=?utf-8?q?TuAYG=26+bD=5CpCJTX31s=5Fp=7Bc7=5D5a=2ED=2E=0A=09Y?=@QddKu_I[XB8; euK=^[=L1I#]rgi[0jgz^4qCTwlj]3kJ)]vc}O"HrA14hN)=?utf-8?q?aXewJPTi=7C=0A=09Pt=7BS3=23Vw4x-?="/:& Cc: Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:59:21 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On June 23, 2009 05:35:16 pm Tim Bishop wrote: > > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is > > too long, why not go with "nls"? > > How about internationalisation? ;-) > > Tim. As a Canadian who prefers en_GB, I fought every urge to propose that one. Since FreeBSD has en_US as its base language, I felt compelled to use zed in of ess :> Thomas - -- Thomas Abthorpe | FreeBSD Committer tabthorpe@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~tabthorpe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkpCMTQACgkQ5Gm/jNBp8qB+PQCfaNgQ5OT8BMBUwkr+0c+Gt/Io uq4AmgJS948BR3k4oAdocfExMibWrOuq =rMR7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----