From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 28 15:06:07 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DFD16A426
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:06:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from suz@alaxala.net)
Received: from pc1.alaxala.kame.net (kame219.kame.net [203.178.141.219])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7659743D45
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:06:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from suz@alaxala.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pc1.alaxala.kame.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DAE625C;
	Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:07:13 +0900 (JST)
Received: from pc1.alaxala.kame.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (pc1.alaxala.kame.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 34108-03; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:07:08 +0900 (JST)
Received: from flora220.uki-uki.net
	(240.163.192.61.tokyo.global.alpha-net.ne.jp [61.192.163.240])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pc1.alaxala.kame.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C1461C9;
	Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:07:07 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:04:53 +0900
Message-ID: <x7r7a5of6y.wl%suz@alaxala.net>
From: SUZUKI Shinsuke <suz@kame.net>
To: craig@olyun.gank.org
X-cite: xcite 1.33
In-Reply-To: <x7u0f2nm7q.wl%suz@alaxala.net>
References: <20051028012957.GA50419@nowhere> <x7wtjynvlm.wl%suz@alaxala.net>
	<20051028040901.GA47012@nowhere> <x7u0f2nm7q.wl%suz@alaxala.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.1 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.0 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Organization: Technical Marketing Dept., ALAXALA Networks Corporation
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at alaxala.kame.net
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.0-RC1 IPv6 losing local subnet route
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:06:08 -0000

Hello Craig,

>>>>> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:18:33 +0900
>>>>> suz@kame.net(SUZUKI Shinsuke)  said:

> > Yes, but em0 and em1 are on different computers attached to the same
> > network (em0 on the second computer isn't connected to anything right
> > now).  I think they have to have the same prefix to talk to each other
> > without routing?
> Now I understand the situation. (I thought em0 and em1 belong to the
> same box)
> 
> I'll check it on this weekend.

I tried the same test using my PC with fxp drivers, but your phenomena
did not happen in my environment (at least for five hours).

Maybe the configured prefix was regarded as off-link by some reason.
(it is theoretically possible in IPv6, but I'm not sure whether it
really happens in your case)

To confirm this, could you show me the result of the following
commands before and after the trouble?
      - ndp -p
      - ifconfig -a

Thanks,
----
SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project