Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:39:55 -0400 From: Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SourceForge changing file distribution scheme! Message-ID: <4ad871310908120839w4de3b5d5pc509e9637bc47886@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090812140314.GA43649@hades.panopticon> References: <20090811152054.GB50944@hades.panopticon> <20090812004416.GA38480@hades.panopticon> <4ad871310908112018r14d439d7v46625beb5bc1e95b@mail.gmail.com> <20090812140314.GA43649@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Dmitry Marakasov<amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote: > * Glen Barber (glen.j.barber@gmail.com) wrote: > >> > So, what do we do? May I commit the patch (+portmgr)? I believe this t= o >> > be the best solution (even if a temporary one if we'll be able to >> > resolve things with SF) as it will be clear which port uses the new >> > scheme and there will be no variety of workarounds. >> >> Perhaps I've lost it in this thread, but is it only a certain amount >> of ports affected? =A0It appears the two SF ports I maintain hiccup a >> bit, but are able to eventually find the distfile. > > This should only affect updating SF ports to new versions. I've checked > your ports, they seem to fetch just fine. > In that case, do you have GNATS access to close the PR I recently filed because of SF fetch errors[1]? If not, I will post a followup to have it closed. Regards, [1] - http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/137597 --=20 Glen Barber
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ad871310908120839w4de3b5d5pc509e9637bc47886>