From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 24 05:36:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A13C16A4B3 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ogi.bezeqint.net (ogi.bezeqint.net [192.115.106.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDD343F3F for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:36:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nimrod-me@bezeqint.net) Received: from localhost.bsd.net.il (bzq-80-55-42.red.bezeqint.net [82.80.55.42])ESMTP id 00DFE8FD1 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:22:26 +0200 (IST) Received: from localhost.bsd.net.il (nimrodm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h9OCY4hY001039 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:34:04 +0200 (IST) (envelope-from nimrodm@localhost.bsd.net.il) Received: (from nimrodm@localhost) by localhost.bsd.net.il (8.12.9p2/8.12.6/Submit) id h9OCY4lS001038 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:34:04 +0200 (IST) From: Nimrod Mesika Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:34:04 +0200 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031024123404.GA969@localhost.bsd.net.il> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20031024112740.GA20599@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031024112740.GA20599@lpthe.jussieu.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 12:36:30 -0000 On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:27:40PM +0200, Michel TALON wrote: > What is more interesting is to look at the actual benchmark results in Take a look at the following paper: Juan E. Navarro and Alan Cox. Mitosis: a high performance, scalable virtual memory system. Technical report TTR01-378, CS Dept., Rice University, April 2001. http://www.cs.rice.edu/~jnavarro/papers/TR01-378.ps Seems like FreeBSD performs rather well even with the inefficient linked list structure. -- Nimrod.