From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 24 17:15:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA7E106566B; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0523B8FC16; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so3926916pbb.13 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:15:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mS+PvY8wrhpO0I9KzCCUY/oVYCHQUXtCA1hHjldO2wk=; b=0BOI/ST9X5qLYrjRT2vnVtHBSARRJMFcMZMxnmnBiWsCxOgVzi3+evMoW2DVHm61nC RXVCHNeAyNHjsg/VYDRaCOyNmInXiNOLLHEcxa9iupm0OLsgcK7Rr5mQwlVD4Pr6h4T/ CVjptItedzmC5c8CGUWJep4A28Ue0BLCzMfSPukRwwfG1AsUmuae1xNhxPJrKuflKx3C vvziXXroXMoAeC/j6E3e1riT7sM1C7L75CmYOCwskBfv6ibfVFa3mP0KtAsJ/YgWDW4z J5vUgrt9nvm1xUR+qEo52yJDYXBRzyAVWogKZc+n16ki9Ee4G12Y8OpjT4dm9VOiYHU0 4RCQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.85.4 with SMTP id d4mr12265696paz.11.1345828510244; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.36.106 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:15:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201208241910.35576.bschmidt@techwires.net> References: <199007581.20120824202155@serebryakov.spb.ru> <201208241910.35576.bschmidt@techwires.net> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:15:10 -0700 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Bernhard Schmidt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature-poor default WPA userland software (hostapd, wpa_supplicant) configuration -- is it inetntional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:15:11 -0000 On 24 August 2012 10:10, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Friday 24 August 2012 18:46:23 Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Enable, play and see? > > ACK. :) > There is more interesting stuff available which needs someone to look > into, eg. briding support and VLANs. I guess the bridging stuff is > required to get 11r running. 11w though requires hardware support if > I'm not totally of. > > There are even a lot of 11n options available which are currently not > supported nor in any other way tunable, this requires stack work, not > only for the supplicant but also for ifconfig. There's also likely a whole bunch of driver and stack things we need. Eg, we need correct VLAN handling (which is fine, we SHOULD have it in net80211, I just don't think it's been tested in a long time.) There's also off-channel traffic support which I know we don't currently do. I have a looong list of 802.11n things to add to the ath driver and debug (correct LDPC/STBC negotiation and driver handling, rate control stuff, AP power save, STA power save, background scanning and off-channel traffic, MIMO power save negotiation and support, correct PS-POLL handling, looking at uAPSD STA/AP handling, adhoc, TDMA...) before I even begin to look at that more fun stuff. Adrian