From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 05:01:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A5316A4CE for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:01:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from wipmail.com.br (200-171-107-246.dsl.telesp.net.br [200.171.107.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6AC43FB1 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:01:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tec@mega.net.br) Received: from admin.mega.net.br wsrv.mega.net.br by matik.com.br (MDaemon.PRO.v6.8.5.R) with ESMTP id 6-md50000000157.tmp for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:37:03 -0300 X-Originating-IP: [200.152.81.43] From: "TEC Meganet" To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:00:43 +0000 Message-ID: <20031121.cyV.23876100@admin.mega.net.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: AngleMail for phpGroupWare (http://www.phpgroupware.org) v 0.9.99.006 X-Lookup-Warning: HELO/EHLO lookup on admin.mega.net.br does not match 200.152.83.39 X-Return-Path: tec@mega.net.br X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-Spam-Processed: mega.net.br, Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:37:06 -0300 Subject: Re: FreeBSD data size tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tec@mega.net.br List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:01:13 -0000 it's here http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.9R/announce.html Peter Pentchev (roam@ringlet.net) wrote*: > >On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >Content-Description: signed data >> On Friday 21 November 2003 10:52, TEC Meganet wrote: >> > The BSd people suggest not using 4.9 >> > in production servers. >> >> They do? > >No. Or at least, I know of no such thing, and it would be interesting >to learn where and who and how has anything like that been suggested :) > >G'luck, >Peter > > >