From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 17:10:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29131065672 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from smtp.mel.people.net.au (smtp.mel.people.net.au [218.214.17.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 209498FC1A for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: (qmail 23595 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2008 17:10:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blizzard.dnsalias.org) (218.215.144.4) by smtp.mel.people.net.au with SMTP; 14 Dec 2008 17:10:35 -0000 Received: by blizzard.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E3D3F1721C; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:10:36 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:10:36 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20081214171036.GC6979@ozzmosis.com> References: <20081112120147.GA62386@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <18754.42851.295211.155980@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4ad871310812121028m4e368da4n69e06d592e312eb0@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750812121113o1590d54r9962ec3d22a20bdb@mail.gmail.com> <4ad871310812121128y18db1c19n8aa45dcc75794739@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750812121149r6581ace1gec21e415afe3deca@mail.gmail.com> <20081212155145.1618810a@scorpio> <4944077F.9000701@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4944077F.9000701@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Release schedules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:10:40 -0000 On Sat 2008-12-13 19:05:35 UTC+0000, Matthew Seaman (m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) wrote: > Ports aren't actually frozen at the moment. Neither are they > completely open for any sort of updates. Instead they're in a 'slush' > -- no sweeping changes permitted, no major changes to the > infrastructure (ie. bsd.ports.mk, that sort of thing). How does one determine the state (frozen/slush/unfrozen/other?) of the Ports tree? Is the state kept in the tree itself?